HomeNewsArticle Display

Command Information

120th Airlift Wing Command Chief Master Sgt. Steven Lynch

120th Airlift Wing Command Chief Master Sgt. Steven Lynch

GREAT FALLS, Mont. -- Another year in the books! Last month Col. Smith summed up all of the outstanding accomplishments you achieved throughout the year. I am truly in awe as I reflect back to the same time last year. It seemed like a large mountain to climb yet I had no doubt as a team we would meet and exceed all the objectives. We flew through the end of conversion right into our first deployment in support of OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE. 

As I look forward to this New Year I find myself asking, "What could we improve as an enlisted force within the wing?"

The first is PME, specifically SNCOA:  Consider this: we had zero candidates for STEP II promotion to senior master sergeant (for the last two cycles) which was directly attributed to the lack of SNCOA. These are folks who had satisfied CCAF (or other secondary degree), Time In Grade, Time In Service and who would have been deemed ready for increased responsibility by their leadership. They had met all requirements except completing SNCOA.

What is the impact? You may be holding up others when you are not promotion ready. Negatively impacting your career is one thing, but a subordinate's career progression is another.  This limits the depth of our bench; those available to replace us as we move on in our careers or into retirement.

A wide talent pool is not only healthy but important to ensure that the right individual is ready at the right time.  An important note is that our ability to accomplish the mission could be at risk if we struggle to fill our deployment requirements due to manning shortfalls.   

I challenge you to get enrolled in SNCOA as soon as possible.  Take advantage of the two year timeframe and be ready when you become eligible.

I recently spotted a bit of billboard wisdom as I was driving around last week which read:  "If you want to get ahead, get started." This really hits home.

The second issue relates to EPR's: we see it as a new requirement when it is something the ANG should have been doing all along and we owe our Airmen true feedback.  We've learned much in the journey so far yet we struggle with the ability to accomplish them in a timely manner. 

I believe the biggest limfac to timely completion is largely self-imposed.  When we started down this road we brought in bullet writing experts, hosted classes, etc. Everyone tried to write the best bullets they could but the reality is this: as we strove for perfection we also held ourselves hostage. It seemed our expectation was centered on the "perfect bullet", but we got stuck in a repetitive churn within groups and squadrons. 

EPR bullets never seemed quite good enough to closeout. Over and over they were returned to the raters for a re-hack not easily closed out without much repetition.  In essence we were wasting a lot of precious time or missing a narrow window of opportunity especially if the rater, ratee etc. was a Traditional Guardsman.

I'd like to offer some helpful guidance: bullet writing is not an exact science, it's very subjective, and we are not PhD-level bullet writers. Let's not have that be the expectation, yes we should strive to improve over time and we've got to get ahead of the game.

This is where squadron CC's, group CC's, chiefs and first sergeants can help, please don't drive unrealistic an expectation for the writing level of bullets, as long as they are honest and accurate that's all that should matter.  

I will caveat for those EPRs coming to the wing for stratification or Senior Rater Endorsement as the EPR should be written commensurate to that level.

Lastly, I would add that returns from the Total Force Service Center continue to challenge us. Better quality control from everyone in the approval chain is the only thing that can improve this. Take seriously your role as reviewers. There is no other agency at this time that will do this for us as we simply are not resourced. 
 
Errors mostly involve shell or header data so let's take the time in our reviews. The learning curve will continue, some frustrations with changes in the latest rewrite of AFI 36-2406 are expected, so take the time to brush up.

Our goal must be to get in front of the static closeout dates and not let them exceed 30 days past the closeout date.

EPR's will continue to challenge us, again I ask group CC's, squadron CC's, chiefs and first sergeants to help your Airmen with this message let's make it achievable, remember it's your process.

  In the December edition of the Big Sky Flyer Col. Smith challenged members to "Take the opportunity to reflect on your professional and personal success in 2016 with an eye toward elevating your aspirations for 2017."  Aspiring to better prepare ourselves for future roles by enrolling in and completing SNCOA is indeed a great way to start the New Year!

Again, I thank you for everything you accomplished in 2016.  You are all truly the best of the best! May you and your families have a blessed New Year!
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.